On
Wednesday, April 16th off the coast of South Korea, a ferry
containing 476 people sank due to undetermined causes, claiming 171 lives. Many
of the dead and missing are high school students and faculty on a school trip. This
disaster has shocked and horrified the Korean people, and called into question
how something like this could have happened. It brings up interesting issues of
accountability in disasters—at the end of the day, who is responsible when
things go wrong on such a monumental level? It also brings up an interesting
commentary on the role that culture plays in disaster response and management.
South
Korea is a country that has pulled itself out of poverty to become the world’s
15th-largest economy, which makes it even more stinging that this is
being labeled a “third-world disaster.” Choi
Kang, vice president of the Ansan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, said
“we are supposed to be a prosperous middle power, but the fundamentals are
still weak.” Part of the reason why the death toll was so high was because the
crew was inexperienced and did not follow emergency procedures. They failed to
notify the coast guard until 53 minutes in, and the captain and crew left the ship
before even notifying most of the passengers as to what was going on. South
Korean President Park Geun-hye, lashes out at them on Monday, saying the "behavior
of the captain and some crew members is beyond understanding and no better than
homicide." However, Park also faces accusations that her newly
restructured Ministry of Security and Public Administration failed at its first
disaster response. Not only that, but the boat was said to have had technical
problems before the incident even occurred. In this situation, a lot of people
are pointing fingers, but it is difficult to say who is responsible for poor
crisis management in the wake of a completely preventable disaster like this. It also brings up a point we talked about in class, which was
disaster preparedness and the importance of existing infrastructure. Although
this is a relatively wealthy country, it did not have the fundamentals in place
for an efficient response, which ultimately lead to the deaths
of many students.
This also brings up the cultural
aspect of disaster management. Since Korean children are taught to respect
their elders from a young age, the students on the boat obeyed orders to stay
in their cabins, and died because of it while the crew escaped. This has caused
a huge sense of collective guilt among Koreans. “Koreans
are very nationalistic and they take pride in the rapid development of their
country. When there’s some problem or anything that reflects poorly on the
collective, on the nation or Koreans on the whole, people will get upset about
it,” said Daniel Pinkson, head of International Crisis Group in Seoul. It would
be interesting to discuss in class the effects of cultural values on how people
respond to a disaster (i.e. how a more individualistic nation like the U.S.
would respond as opposed to a more collectivist one like China).
Sources: http://abcnews.go.com/International/ferry-disaster-left-south-korea-traumatized-shamed/story?id=23437866&singlePage=true
http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-south-korea-calamity-20140423,0,480756,full.story#axzz2zmZMFOlH
I completely agree with you when you say that there are fingers being pointed about how the disaster response was handled. Park, is one of the VERY few females who hold a very high political role in an Asian state. In what should have been her shining moment to show the international community how well new leadership can take on such a disaster-they failed. It's so unfortunate that things like this still happen and those in leadership who have the power to do something- don't do enough.
ReplyDelete